//
you're reading...
Uncategorized

I Like My “Models” with “Curves” (or the Grandfather Paradox)

Continuing our Quantum Computing Crash (Collision?) Course to get you ready for our upcoming performance of BOUNDED IN A NUTSHELL (help us BUILD A NUTSHELL HERE) –

Time+Machine+CoverIt was the boogey man in almost every time-travel story I remember. The “Grandfather Paradox.” The hypothetical scenario where a time traveler could go back in time and kill his/her own grandfather. Would the time traveler cease to exist (having just killed his/her own father’s progenitor)? And, after ceasing to exist, would said traveler now be able to go back in time and kill his/her own grandfather? Would the whole mess just cancel itself out? Or would the entire cosmos, trying to have these two plausible possibilities happening at once, be unable to accommodate both realities and simply blink out of existence?

The horror. The horror.

Trying to make sense of all of this kept me up many a night as a kid. How could all eventualities be possible? What if someone in the future was about to travel back in time and do something foolish or crazy (thus blinking the cosmos out of existence)?

The universe would end and we’d never know why?

Fortunately, Lee Billings writing for Science America has assured us that the quantum realm likely doesn’t allow any of these doomsday scenarios to play out because, per experimentation, the particles involved follow “the fuzzy rules of probability rather than strict determinism.”

Although I’m not sure if that’s any more comforting. At least we know what to expect with “strict determinism.” “Probability” expands possibility. But it also increases uncertainty. Right? If 1 + 1 can equal sums beyond 2, what menacing doors might that open up?

So, the model goes something like this:

1.) Send a particle through a “closed timelike curve.”

2.) According to our fearless scientists, “Any particle entering one end of a CTC [closed timelike curve] must emerge at the other end with identical properties…”

3.) “Therefore, a particle emitted by the machine with a probability of one half would enter the CTC and come out the other end…with a probability of one half, imbuing itself at birth with a probability of one half…

Everyone got that???

4.) Conclusion??? “If the particle were a person, she would be born with a one-half probability of killing her grandfather, giving her grandfather a one-half probability of escaping death at her hands—good enough in probabilistic terms to close the causative loop and escape the paradox. Strange though it may be, this solution is in keeping with the known laws of quantum mechanics.”

Everyone still with me???

So probability is keeping the complete dismantling of our universe in check and would apparently beat the snot out of strict determinism in a Celebrity Death Match.

Knowing that lets me sleep at night again.

Advertisements

Discussion

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: